A Turkish Private Equity Web Log

In an effort to cover the Turkish Private Equity Industry - for the promotion of Entrepreneurship, the private equity asset-investment model, and the communication thereof.


Summary: METU/ODTÜ Holds Entrepreneur/Investor Summit
At the beginning of November, I happily attended the Entrepreneur-Investor Summit hosted by Middle East Technical University (METU/ODTÜ) at the Ritz Carlton in Istanbul. I went there with many ideas and goals in mind. However, what I took away was somewhat different from my expectations.

First and foremeost, who attended the event? A fine list of panelists can be found on the Metutech site. However, the attendees constituted:
  • International Banks - The EIF, the EIB and KFW presented their foci on helping other banks fund entrepreneurship through loans. Only the EIF through the EIB acts as Fund of Funds to the venture space.
  • European Angels - The midmorning panel consisted of a discussion on the merits, successes and opportunities of setting up an angel investor network. This included The European Business Angels Network (EBAN), and the Italian Business Angels Network (IBAN) as well as The London Business Angels. All stressed the need for increased legislation on the taxation or tax incentives for angel investments - which could in turn aid innovation and entrepeneurship. Only a handful of Turkish Angels were believed to be present in the room.
  • Entrepreneurs - Since the Summit was preceded by a business plan workshop online and presentations to a panel of angels for evaluation, it is only natural to see some entrepreneurs in the audience. Apparently, 18 entrepreneurs were able to present, but no word on if any got funded.
  • Innovation/Entrepreneur Consultants - A few European firms attended and sat on panels to discuss their particular methodology behind becoming innovative, how to present a business plan, and how to succeed at finding investors.
  • Academicians - Of course, with ODTÜ organizing the event, there were quite a few academics in the audience asking poignant questions. The event was also organized with the help of International Relay Centers (IRC) Anatolia, TTGV, KOSGEB, and MetuTech.
  • Turkish Finance Brokers - There were a few representatives of Turkish Brokerage firms in attendance. They were looking for both corporate venturing opportunities with entrepreneurs, or investors for their own funds. Perhaps they just wanted to hear about the current status of innovation, entrepreneurship, and news on the incubation/venture/private equity space. It is hit or miss whether they found what they were looking for.
  • Government Representatives - The event was delayed as we waited for the arrival of the Secretary of the Ministry of Industry - Hilmi Guler, who then preceded to go on and on about the development of energy in Turkey and how it vaguely applies to increasing innovation and entrepreneurship. Perhaps showing the readiness for foreign investment in Turkey was the goal here. Needless to say, the entrepreneurs and guys in Turkey's garages present in the conference hall couldn't have cared less. TUBITAK spoke (in Turkish) about the number of patents and published works - much of what can be seen on their website. TTGV, frankly, gave a very enlightening presentation on TTGV's work and increased spending (despite their small budget). Mete Çakmacı of TTGV confirmed my supspicions when he stated, "{In Turkey} Entrepreneurs have naive expectations {about obtaining funds and the requirements of that investment}, they want a 'life-style' business."

Notice anyone missing? Exactly. In all the sessions and panels, only one representative from an official Turkish venture capital firm was on a panel, and I have heard since the conference only a few were in attendance. Suleyman Yilmaz, CEO of Kobi A.Ş sat on the last panel. His firm comprises of 20 million YTL with the backing of TOBB, KOSGEB and various Chambers of Commerce from 15 cities.

In Mr. Yilmaz's presentation, he was fairly pessimistic regarding the current entrepreneurial environment. Some of his statistics were no different than any other VC. Of the 800 applications since the beginning of the fund, 3 investments were made. The translator mentioned that 400 of those applications/business plans were in very bad shape. Disappointingly, Mr. Yilmaz did not stick around for questions after the panel.

Suprisingly, there were those at the conference who believed that only 2 or 3 venture firms existed in Turkey, which is definitely debateable. However, not suprisingly, the consensus of the presenters confirmed that on the demand side there is a lack of activity and an investment gap between the incubation stage and growth stages. This was summarized as a gap between €100K - €3/5 million. Anthony Clarke, Managing Director of GLE Growth Capital (as well as Chairman of British Business Angel Association (BBAA) and President of European Business Angels Network (EBAN)) stated, "There is not only an equity gap, but we have a management gap." For the investor, the supply side barriers are simply that management teams are just not good enough in most business plans and the variety of risks to invest in some countries are simply too great. Here's a link to Anthony Clarke's PPT "Angels and Angle Co-Investment Funds" via the Metutech website.

Mr. Risto Kalske from Finland and Director of SITRA, The Finnish Innovation Fund, quite interestingly told the story of how Finland built a fund of funds to spur the venture capital market which in turn spurs the innovation of entrepreneurship. This in turn - worked - and it is only now, that Finland is starting to concentrate on Science and Technology Parks. This is exactly the opposite of what Turkey has done, and in my eyes confirms that the next great step for Turkey would be to establish this Fund of Funds. Here's the link to Mr. Risto Kalske's PPT "Public Measures: Encouragement for Private Capital?" courtesy of the IRC website

Overall, What Were the Results?

  • European Angels gained a better perspective on Turkey. Unfortunately, Turkish Angels were not in attendance. A Turkish Business Angel Network has a domain registered but whether it has been formed is up to speculation (although there are 2 Angels from Turkey registered with EBAN). This is probably why Angel Network representatives did not hang around for the last session.
  • 18 Entrepreneurs were able to improve their business plans and give their elevator pitches at the coffee breaks. (It would be interesting to learn if any of these entrepreneurs got funded - in the comments of this post.)
  • For academics, METU learned what to do (or not to do) for next year. Perhaps there will now be a deeper focus on attendance, innovation building and closing the venture funding gap.
  • As publisher of Grandstanding Traction, I received a number of topics and ideas on content to publish and improve this site. (To be continued...)

To conclude, upon speaking with a prominent Director of a Venture/Entrepreneurship consultancy, it was voiced that "At these types of conferences, you never know what kind of crowd is going to show up." Pardon the Forrest Gump analogy, but indeed, Entrepeneurs (and prospective fund managers) who were looking for investors - they most likely did not find them. For Business Angel Networks looking for Angels in Turkey to band together - they probably didn't find them. For academics looking for answers toward improving innovation and entrepeneurship - let's hope they found enlightenment. In addition, let's hope the government gets the follow-up memo.

book mark <$BlogItemTitle$> at Technorati!Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Posted @ 20:42   0 Comments
ODTÜ-Teknokent and KOSGEB Hold "Entrepreneur-Investor Meeting": Training for Entrepreneurs
Middle East Technical University Metutech (ODTÜ-Teknokent) and KOSGEB (Small/Medium-size Industry Development Organization - see left sidebar) have teamed up and are holding an "Entrepreneur-Investor Meeting" in Istanbul. The Entrepreneur-Investor Meeting {Site Link} will take place at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel on Oct. 31 and Nov. 1st. A Forum will convene on Nov. 2nd to discuss, "Early-Stage Funding in Technology Start-Ups / Benchmarkings for Turkey".

For entrepreneurs of Turkey, this is exciting news, but you must hurry to register. The program includes an "Online Business Plan Preparation Training" between September 15, 2007 and October 15, 2007 where entrepreneurs are trained in the necessities of arranging their own business plan. Registration for this training will cost 450 YTL.

Then according to the website:
Technology entrepreneurs that successfully complete the training will present the business plans to be prepared by them to a team of experts in venture capital and business plan evaluation during the "Business Plan Review Board" activity to be held on October 31, 2007, where they will finalize their business plans by obtaining the opinions of experts as well.

During the "Entrepreneur-Investor Meeting", which will be organized on November 1, 2007, on the other hand, technology entrepreneurs will share their business plans with potential actual investors – business angels or venture capital companies. Our objective is to allow the minimum technology start-up to proceed on its way with new funding opportunities …
Then on Nov. 2nd, the "Early-Stage Funding in Technology Start-Ups / Benchmarkings for Turkey" Forum will take place as an all-day event. This event is open to the first 200 registrations, and is only 30 YTL, so sign up today. The Forum panel looks to include many dignataries from TUBITAK, TTGV and various Angel Investment Networks from Europe. This shall be a very interesting forum to spectate as we well see some very professional opinions on the current state of incubation and Series A Round Venturing in Turkey with models coming from Europe.

For a long time, I have always stressed the idea of good business planning and its need for an educative place in the building of Turkey's innovation and entrepreneurship. In previous interviews with Turkish VCs, I am constantly amazed by the lack of knowledge in the business planning area from the entrepreneurs part. But now, with this Training and Forum, it looks like KOSGEB, TUBITAK, TTGV and ODTÜ are finally making some choices toward entrepreneur education. While not really a fan of what the government can do with its bureaucracy and many faceted organizations that take up the Turkish R&D space, it will be interesting to see their take on this forum moving forward.

Perhaps in the future, why is it that only the entrepreneurs who take the training are able to participate in the Business Plan Meetings with investors? Do entrepreneurs usually have 450 lira to pitch their ideas? I would also encourage atleast in the future a more open submission guideline, perhaps an extra day for outside submissions and evaluations by committee.

In addition, by the look of those attending on the forum, it looks like we will capture an interesting viewpoint by leaders in the Angel Investor space. Most curiously (and poignantly), none of these angel organizations are from Turkey. Yes, I realize, per my last post, that for Turkey's incubated companies getting out of the Science and Technoparks; they are having trouble finding financing and are being lost in a "VC funding gap". Continually we are seeing more and more incubation, and non-existant VC investment and/or higher VC investments, basically squeezing out the entrepreneurs looking for that Seed-Venture round. We will have to wait and see what our friends at KOSGEB, TTGV and TUBITAK feel about this issue.

Thanks again to my friends at Endeavor who passed this on to me.

book mark <$BlogItemTitle$> at Technorati!Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,


Posted @ 21:03   1 Comments
EVCA Releases Quarterly Report: Median Venture Investment Surpasses €3 million
At the end of August, the European Venture Capital Association produced its quarterly report with the help of Dow Jones, VentureOne, and Ernst & Young. The highlight of the report, published here by AltAssets, is that European venture capital investment reached €1.14bn in Q2 2007 despite a drop in deal flow to 213 in Q2 2007 from 223 in Q1 and 265 in the same period last year.

While great news for investors and entrepreneurs in Europe with a venture model coming of age, the real story should be next quarters results to understand if the markets and appetite for investments remained confident after the credit fluctuations in the US and abroad. Surely the investing of private equity funds in this stage of the cycle does not stop investors from investing funds in smart companies. As of yet, we still have not seen any stagnation in fundraising either. As well, what IRRs these funds will be gaining is another area of interest in the years to come.

But I think what is most striking about this report is that the median size of venture investment round has surpassed €3 million. Here is an excerpt from the report that is most telling about this:
'The European venture capital market saw an explosion in early-round investing as €600m was poured into 126 early stage deals,' said Jessica Canning, director of global research for Dow Jones VentureOne. 'The data shows the median amount invested in a first round during the quarter was €3.2m, by far the highest total on record. Add to that a continued interest in later stage deals and the overall median for a deal done in Europe jumped 41 per cent during the second quarter to a record €3.1m.'

'The record median round size in Europe this quarter is the continuation of a trend that we have observed over the last 18 months in which investors are providing greater sums to fewer companies, allowing those companies to better compete globally and build critical mass for an IPO or M&A,' added John De Yonge, research director for the Ernst & Young Global Venture Capital Advisory Group.
Buyout funds around the world are setting records in fundraising. For example; see how Carlyle has just closed its Carlyle Europe Partners III out at a cool $7 billion. While some VCs in Silicon Valley are even complaining that the VC model is broken, some even giving money back to LPs (Sevin Rosen), we have to pause and wonder "Where is the venture model going?" Research has proven that with increased fund sizes comes increased median investment sizes and increased valuations of investments whether inflated or not, and increaing acquisition prices. The decreasing number of investments could be considered direct support for the "Venture Capital Model is Broken" Theory, and is definitely cause for concern. We have all talked about the "Funding Gap" that exists between Seed and Incubation Investment and Series A. Are we reaching a stage where incubated companies will only have banks (or possibly angels) to turn to? What should fill this gap is the true venture model.

And for Turkey, firstly we should be concerned how much of the EVCA number includes Turkey if any. We should also be concerned about the outliers in the data that constitute venture. Secondly, since the Turkish government has pinned "so much" investment toward the building of incubator science and technoparks, we must ponder about our incubated companies who will simply not make the cut when looking for that venture financing. The foci of Turkish Venture Funds is still fairly traditional - technology (with some stipulations). And if the median investment round is to increase - what then? The funding gap has just gotten larger...

Finally, once again, I'm going to send a shout out to the Turkish Venture Capital Assocation (if there is one) that is actually registered with the EVCA, and challenge them, "Where is the data?" I'm willing to work with you here. Would someone at the EVCA give them a call, please? Maybe the fault does not lie with the TVCA, but rather the reluctance of Turkish VCs toward paying dues and continuing the work of the TVCA! If you want to set the record straight on this, I urge the TVCA, the EVCA or any Turkish VC to contact this site, or comment below.

book mark <$BlogItemTitle$> at Technorati!Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Posted @ 09:27   0 Comments
Incubation or Corporate Venturing: E-mbrio Releases Incubation Results
Long ago, I shared my thoughts in a post on the founding and dealflow of E-mbrio by Teknoloji Holding (The Long Tail of Venture Capital). I slated it as an incubator based out of the confines of Teknoloji Holding, and applauded the establishment of such a firm and have waited patiently for any results.

Well, recently, I took a look at Embrio's website for any news. Apparently, after 650 applications, 1 company, SuperTeklif was chosen. Founder Murat Serdar Ozyasar presented his idea to the E-mbrio team. E-mbrio's subsidiary, DataProfil A.S, developed the sales and marketing process where SuperTefklif was repositioned as Turkey’s “first web-based authorized marketing platform", while E-mbrio developed the software and design.

But for Teknoloji Holding, has E-mbrio become a full-fledged incubator or merely a creative spin on rolling out an innovative business development platform for investing in young entrepreneurs with great ideas, taking some risks and building a portfolio? Either way, corporate venturing is a great way to spur innovation, but still hold on to control of company resources. For an overview of corportate venturing, according to Altassets analysis of the PWC and NVCA Money Tree Report, 2nd quarter corporate VC investment reached a level that has not been seen since 2002.

Just recently, I also spoke about the issues that a Turkish incubator needs to face (Is Turkey ready for Incubators?). Does an independently-founded incubator stand a chance? Or should we really be comparing E-mbrio to the likes of corporate venture capital giants such as Siemens Venture Capital, Ericcson, IBM and Cisco (as seen in the left sidebar)? Teknoloji Holding may not have the clout of these behemoths, but you can't blame them for trying. Also, we must not forget the latest trends that we are seeing in the establishment of:
  • Accelerators - Such as Siemens (left sidebar)
  • "Co-operative" Combinators - Such as Y Cominator, YEurope, and HitForge
  • VC-funded "Entrepreneur Bootcamps" - Such as Techstars.
    (For links to these, see Post: Incubators: Is Turkey Ready for This?)
These are exciting new trends and should produce interesting results going forward. We'll have to see how this will reshape the landscape, for Turkey and abroad.


book mark <$BlogItemTitle$> at Technorati!Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , ,


Posted @ 23:11   0 Comments
Is Turkey Ready for Incubators? - An Answer
In my previous post, I posed the question, "Is Turkey ready for the concept of business incubation?" I'd like to point out the listed incubators on the Grandstanding Traction sidebar as current proof, but I'll summarize my feelings on the question as such:
  1. Discipline: First of all, the Turkish entrepreneur needs to have structured ideas in the form of business planning, or atleast understand how to convey ideas in both the technical and business sense. Finding entrepreneurs with this knowledge and level of written implementation may be hard to come by. Once an entrepreneur receives funding, they must understand that it is not a golden parachute. Pursuing cash flow, profits and an exit for investors must be in the cards. If an incubator were to throw $5000 at someone, this may actually not be taken seriously - in addition to the loss of 2-10% equity. It will be up to the investor to have a hands-on approach in coaching, motivation and dispute resolution - because the idea of equity financing is still a foreign concept. To some, this may even appear foolish. A larger loan from a bank might seem cheaper to an entrepreneur despite the loss of mentorship.

  2. Friends and Family: In the Turkish business world of family oligarchs, the funding of business aspirations through family bootstrapping is very prominent. According to a study by the OECD in 2000,
    "99.8% of all enterprises were SMEs employing 76.7% of the workforce. Some estimates slate that the informal economy could also represent 50% of SME activity. Nonetheless, despite the employment, SMEs operate with comparatively little capital equipment, generate relatively low levels of value added, make only a small contribution to Turkish exports and receive only a marginal share of the funds mobilised by the banking sector."
    Thus, the fundamental weaknesses of the sector were stated as insufficient know-how and very low technology. So, as I've said before, the enterprise with the ability to look past the culture of family ownership toward 3rd party investors will perhaps enjoy greater chances of expansion. For an incubator to step in and invest so little compared to the value of a father's money, for example, might be a difficult hurdle to overcome for a Turkish entrepreneur. Again, it is the concept of parting with equity that may be difficult. However, needless to say, there are still a lot of opportunities out there for SME investment, provided the pipeline, whereas good due diligence is still important at the end of the day.

  3. The Turkish Angels/VC Network: The network of Turkish VC's is a small but tight group of wealthy individuals. In some cases, syndications with other VC's are simply a phone call away, while the ability of a VC to fund using their own money can be a suprisingly easy, alternative step for an entrepreneur. In the end, whether it is through a large fund, an incubator, or an angel investor, the ability of the entrepreneur to convey a differentiated idea that displaces competition while generating cash flow will definitely find funding. The crux of the problem is that the existance of private sector venture capital in Turkey has only emerged in the last 10-15 years, and even then, the top-end of private equity M&A is where most of competition for deals lies. Some colleagues have even mentioned the rush toward the high-end deals and the mid-cap, leaving a giant vacuum, and therefore minimal competition, of venture capital funding. Thus, for an incubator (or an accelerator), finding dealflow is crucial. Whether it is through contacts, universities, or business plan competitions, access to innovative Turks at the forefront of development is the deal maker or breaker. This must be considered about all else before renting that office, hiring that assistant and putting the name on the door.

  4. Minority Shareholder Rights: I've mentioned before the importance of corporate governance, and the nightmarish problems of the past. Between the judicial system and bureaucracy, shareholder rights are a pivotal concern amoung investors, both foreign and domestic. Entrepreneurs giving up equity need to realize that with VC funding comes a Term Sheet detailing the rights of the investor and what it entails. This may be a hard pill to swallow for some. Finding legal aid to put together such documents and making them valid may even give a few headaches, although manageable. An incubator, just like a VC, must be able to have all legal issues at arms length, for it might very well be somewhat of a sales pitch, not to mention a little hand-holding, guiding the entrepreneur towards understanding on these issues. But in the end, if the governmental systems show any sign of not working, all of this is for naught, and the investment climate may indeed get a little cold, and very quickly.

  5. The Exit: Again, with a good network of individuals, VC's, Angels, and pertinant industry contacts, an exit is not impossible, given the current climate. Series A, B or C may operate a little differently, with or without more syndication, but ideally, funding great ideas and individuals can still reap good rewards. But we must now look at whether the incubator is funded "privately" or through a larger parent company. Yes, we must also remember that certain large companies R&D departments may spin-off into their own incubators/think-tanks and gravitate toward their own interests. These do exist in Turkey (see sidebar). If this is the case, motivation toward an exit and grandstanding of such may be very minimal, if necessary at all. However, from a seperate privately-held incubator, the exit of incubation is no different from Silicon Valley to the Levent-Maslak corridor.

  6. The "Export of Brains": One issue has come up of late which I have discussed with a few colleagues as a viable option when funding entrepreneurs in Turkey - The export of entrepreneurs. This is not human trafficking! You may have heard of "Brain Drain", so perhaps we can call this the "Export of Brains". The idea is simple. Most Turkish VC's have existing contacts in Silicon Valley, the US, England, France, Germany, the Middle East, Israel and other countries. An incubator, given the right opportunity, with the right entrepreneur, technology, and timing, could very well incubate entrepreneurs outside of Turkey. As long as the Term Sheet is sound, investors and their "incubatees" could set up shop on Sand Hill Road, brush elbows with known industry contacts, find more funding, place them in prime location for market penetration, and even line them up for the next great IPO. Of course, for those people who believe Turkey will be the next Silicon Valley, don't let me stop you from staying put. In the end, the VC needs to find the best resources for its investments, and if that just happens to be overseas while still maintaining investment potential, more the better.
Nonetheless, with the current supply of deals and entrepreneurs in Turkey, and the current demand of deals from the quantity of VC's in the market, there may be an equilibrium (if not an oversupply of deals), with minimal competition. What happens if more VC's appear or don't appear on the scene? What happens if the government gets wise and finally educates and nurtures more entrepreneurs the right way? If this could happen, we could see a dramatic shift in Turkey's production output and innovation drive. Once more people start to understand the VC model, perhaps we could actually see more innovation coming out of Turkey, and not just cookie-cutter students studying subjects they never wanted. Until then, incubators and VC's alike have a tough road ahead, one that should demand attention.

book mark <$BlogItemTitle$> at Technorati!Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: , , , , ,


Posted @ 00:28   1 Comments
More on Incubators: Is Turkey Ready For This?
Strolling through various posts the other day, I came upon Venturebeat's post concerning the Incubator Buzz over Y Combinator. Y Combinator as well as David Cohen's and Brad Feld's Techstars are incubators of a new breed. The idea is simple. Entrepreneurs with viable business plans apply for a three month "training camp". If accepted, the entrepeneur typically receives around $5000 funding for the idea plus an additional $5000 each for 1-3 employees. The teams are then flown to and mentored by their investors for the three month period. Entrepreneurs must agree to give up 2-10% equity of their companies.

Interestingly enough, a European version has popped up in Vienna. YEurope (no relation to Y Combinator) coins itself as a "startup-startup" and offers the same terms. For Turkish entrepreneurs who wish to enter the gates of Vienna after only answering 31 questions - this is your chance! You need to hurry, though, YEurope's application deadline is May 15th.


Techcrunch and Venturebeat also commented on HitForge. Located in San Francisco, it is another form of incubator. At Hitforge, if you fancy yourself as an inventor, a dreamer, a coder, a guru, or simply an MBA - HitForge wishes you to apply and enter their matrix of contacts. Deemed an "Entrepreneur Co-operative", HitForge is looking for the next technical founder/designer with a portfolio and scruples toward worldly product ambitions. They claim they will put you together with other people - and together you will all share the profits - pending success.

My question: Would these concepts work in Turkey? {To be answered in the next post.}

book mark <$BlogItemTitle$> at Technorati!Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Labels: ,


Posted @ 22:22   0 Comments
Subscribe  



This website and content designed and edited by turkvcanalyst@gmail.com.
© Copyright 2006 to present. All rights reserved.